PledgeBank is now closed to new submissions. The site is available as an archive for you to browse, but you can no longer create or sign pledges. Find out more…

United States
I’ll do it, but only if you’ll help

Note: On this test site, the date is faked to be 2021-07-30

You are reporting the following comment to the PledgeBank team:

It's a shame that Simon feels that commercial offsetting organisations are 'dodgy and dubious' while charities are good. This is much too simplistic. There are plenty of high salaries and overheads found in charities and there are some well-run, low overhead offset companies. One model is not intrinsically better than the other - it depends on the organisation. The key is to ask the right questions of any offset organisation, i.e. what percentage of turnover is spent directly on projects, how is additionality achieved, what accreditation do they have, is tree planting of a type appropriate to the location, is it carried out on land in the ownership of the offset organisation? etc, etc. We had hoped that the proposed government standard would help with this but it doesn't. It appears to be designed exclusively to help prop up the compliance market by pushing voluntary offsetters into buying such offsets.


Mike Rigby
Mike Rigby, 14 years ago.

Report abusive, suspicious or wrong comment

Please let us know exactly what is wrong with the comment, and why you think it should be removed.