<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5">
<title>Comments on wewontflyforart5 pledge</title>
<link>http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5</link>
<description>Comments on 'not fly for art5'</description>
<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
<dc:creator>team@pledgebank.com</dc:creator>
<syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
<syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
<syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2985456" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2984422" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2984358" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2983750" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2985456">
<title>Comment by adam</title>
<link>http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2985456</link>
<description>you know, i can certainly appreciate the willpower and principle behind this pledge, but i wonder how this will de-escalate art careering, or how it will bring any kind of attention to artists.
perhaps individuals ought to first consider their ends, not means? we all know its a tough gig, and being choosy about opportunity is foolish, so if you want to be low-key, do it. if your motives require you to get on a plane, then do it. i'm just not sure isolating the airline industry for boycott is going to help any artists. 
and why is this only open to artists? would not others benefit from this &amp;quot;view from the ground?&amp;quot; and, perhaps most importantly (though i understand the viral aspirations of this pledge), why will you only do this if others will join? sounds kind of weak to be honest.
this is coming from an artist/appreciator/inspiration junkie who logged over 30k miles on his truck this year, and walks a couple miles on a slow day. and you know what else? i flew for the first time in two years last week, across the atlantic ocean. and you know what else, i met people in those lines and on those planes, and you know what else? i felt inspired when i looked out that window. and damn right i did it for art; i don't think i would have any other reason...</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2984422">
<title>Comment by Steven Read</title>
<link>http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2984422</link>
<description>HELL YES! Fantastic idea. Minimize the burdens of art and it only gets better.</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2984358">
<title>Comment by dirk</title>
<link>http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2984358</link>
<description>i like this idea quite alot. but why only for six months, and why only if six others do the same??</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2983750">
<title>Comment by diwologue</title>
<link>http://www.pledgebank.com/wewontflyforart5#comment_2983750</link>
<description>Agnieszka's pledge is the last in the series of &amp;quot;We Wont Fly for Art&amp;quot; pledges and it has only one day left to run. 

Originally designed with the potential for exponential growth, this collective intervention into the workings and relations of art infrastructure is on the verge of dying out...unless... one artist pledges to refrain from flying for art for 6 months AND replicates the pledge here.</description>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
