"I will never sign the Euston Manifesto but only if 10 other people will also refuse to."
— Ian, democratic, progressive, and sceptical. (contact)
Deadline to sign up by: 28th May 2007
29 people signed up (19 over target)
Country: United Kingdom
More details
I'd call myself democratic and progressive - hell, I even subscribe to the New Statesman - but the Euston Manifesto does not speak to or for me. Obviously, we can see how many people have signed the manifesto, but there has not been, up to now, a single place where people can say "Thanks, but no thanks."
Clearly, this pledge is self-fulfilling, and not enormously scientific, but then again you only need a name and e-mail address to sign the Euston Manifesto, as well.
This is a rough and ready attempt to create a proxy by which to judge the Manifesto's success, or otherwise...
See more pledges, and all about how PledgeBank works.

Ian, the Pledge Creator, joined by:
Ah well.
However, the experiment continues. If you do not accept the Euston Manifesto, please add your name to the list.
Can I pledge instead not to burn down any orphanages and not tell any people that they are idiots? For today only, mind you.
P.S. The colors on that page really... no, I have given that pledge above.
But then sorry mate, none of this online stuff really means anything. I could sign your pledge 1000+ times with no bother and, at the same time, sign the Euston Manifesto 1000+ times.
I'm not only sceptical, I'm cynical too. Good luck!
PS this is a genuine comment, I didn't fake it at all. Honest. Look in my eyes, am I lying?
http://www.google.com/search?q=Euston+Ma...
http://eustonmanifesto.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euston_Mani...
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/norm...
Are mostly in favour, being written by the authors, but a good critique I read at the time is:
http://numero57.net/?p=65
I would say it's been forgotten, but it hasn't, people mimic what they tried to do, and it influences the media and certain elements of the 'left'. I still intensely dislike the patronising tone, the straw men arguments and the waste of verbiage in what could have been a simple, punchy document.
Given Norm's background, you'd have thought he'd know about the Chartists, for example.
What do you reckon, one last push?
'The many left opponents of regime change in Iraq who have been unable to understand the considerations that led others on the Left to support it, dishing out anathema and excommunication, more lately demanding apology or repentance, betray the democratic values they profess.'
No, they just disagree with you, and you have written a whole manifesto to whinge about it because you are annoyed that you were proven wrong over Iraq. GET OVER IT!!!
Also, doesn't section 12 - 'Historical Truth' - somewhat contradict with section 15 - 'We stand against all claims to a total — unquestionable or unquestioning — truth.'
Hmmm...
The sheer arrogance of the whole thing simply astounds me! They go on about being critical and open, but then assert Enlightenment ideals (and other universalistic beliefs) with all the vigour of rich, white men who don't think that the rest of the world has anything to teach them.
Grrrr.... I hope this lot never end up in charge of the world!