Pledge “loosechange”
"I will buy 10 copies of "Loose Change 2nd Edition" and distribute them for free to people who need to know. but only if 100 other people will do the same."
— Mark Sugrue
Deadline to sign up by: 4th July 2006
36 people signed up, 64 more were needed
More details
"Loose Change (2ed)" is an extraordinary documentary about the events of September 11th 2001 and the hundreds of unanswered questions and hushed up details of that awful day. The documentary was made by three brave 20-something film makers with their own production company called "Louder than Words". But even though the film is pure knock out quality, these guys aren't going to get rich from it. They're giving it away to get the word out. You can buy 10 copies from loosechange911.com for $30, including postage to anywhere in the world. Also, many people sell this DVD for a few pounds on ebay.co.uk. Its even available for download and on video.google.com for free. The documentary is recommended by everyone from Utah Physics Professor Steve Jones to Hollywood star Charlie Sheen.
Go and watch this documentary. The world will never seem the same again. Then get yourself a bunch of copies and give them to friends, family and strangers. Send a copy to journalists and your local MP/representative. Everyone needs to see this movie.
- stay clean for ever!
- donate $10 every month for Chris L. to manage the FSP administration
- give a percentage or more of the Canton Free TV project of $4000
- Wear My Hair Natural & Promote Natural Hair
See more pledges, and all about how PledgeBank works.
Things to do with this pledge
Current signatories (
= they've done it)
Mark Sugrue, the Pledge Creator, joined by:
- Chuck
- Raemie
- Striver
- MATS
- Vincent
- Joe
- Jill Bowers
- jackchit
- Seth
- George
- Kat Dillon
- John Stumpf
- Sir Arthur Grebe-Streebling
- armando rodriguez
- Jeff Nagle
- V Olyunina
- FREDDY MARQUEZ
- Karen Sugrue
- Matthew Waters
- Shocker
- Michael Wells
- Blake
- sunjay
- John
- Nick Everett
- Steve Marcoux
- DanielsNews.com
- Sunny Henderson
- Gustavo
- CrazyBlade
- Stephen James Sakamoto
- Solly Cardy
- Simon Young
- Turturis
- Mohmed Patel
- 1 person who did not want to give their name
Comments on this pledge
http://search.ebay.co.uk/search/search.d...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
But if you but directly from "Louder than Words" it does support the making of future versions.
So many are in a Sleep Mode here and it has to be understood that the TRUTH is a Fearful venture.
I've committed myself to work with many different people, organisation and groups to bring about a return to the spiritual realm. One has to speak up and protest when most men remain silent are cowards, accomplices and robotic pylons. One cannot be honest and lie at the same time...
911 is merely the most known chapter!!!!
These guys couldn't be farther from the truth if they tried. They don't seem to have checked a single fact. Please don't support such shoddy work.
I recommend downloading the video and following along with the critique before making an investment.
I have read the anonymously written "Viewers guide" linked above by Gravy. It makes a number of good points about the film and I recommend everybody reads it. However, don't take that at face value either. It makes a large number of false claims and assumptions. It also has a tendency to dismiss sources with phrases like "This guy must be biased". (If I have time some day I'll write a "Readers guide" to the "Viewers guide")
If you want a pure science video, try
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
My post was to a new and much improved version of my critique. Unless you read it in the past day, you read a draft that wasn't meant for public release. On the critique I give my email and ask for specific constructive criticism. If you can point to any "false claim or assumption" I've made, please do, and I'll make the change. No one has done so thus far.
It's one thing to say "don't take this at face value," quite another for Avery & co. to simply believe anything they hear and not bother to check anything out. this is 9/11 we're talking about, not a game. I stand by my statement that they get every claim wrong, and I back up my research with a mountain of evidence.
Just one example is the statement on page 70 that the towers didn't fall at "nearly freefall speed". This is contradicted by the NIST report, NCSTAR 1-6 section 9.3.3: "the building section above came down essentially in free fall, as seen in the videos."
Mark
The first foreign leader to contact US President Bush following 9/11 was Russian president Putin. Putin offered his sympathy and pointed out that Russia had experienced similar terrorism recently.
This is a documentary recently posted on Google Video. It explores the events of 9/9/99 in Moscow when a working class appartment building blew up in the night. Dozens were killed.
The government immediately blamed 'Chechen terrorists' and launched a war in that southern republic that has killed 300,000 people to date.
However, a few days later, alert residents of another appartment building caught three people planting bombs. But these 'terrorists' had FSB (the new KGB) badges...
Obviously this isn't the place for an extended discussion of 9/11 details, which is why I requested that people emsil me with suggested corrections to my critique. There is also an active discussion of these issues on teh JREF site, which I participate in http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t...
I would discuss these issues on the "Loose Change" forum, but dissenting views are not allowed there. Just look at the thread there titled "Why was Gravy banned?" (Unless the mods have removed it. They do that). Strange behavior for a "truth movement."
But since you posted here, here's my response to your "free fall" comment.
It's good to keep quotes in context. The NIST quote you used is completely contrary to the idea of controlled demolition. Here it is edited for brevity, but in context:
"The structure below the level of collapse initiation offered minimal resistance to the falling building mass .... The potential energy released by the downward movement of the large building mass far exceeded the capacity of the intact structure below to absorb that ....
Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance to the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section above came down essentially in free fall .... As the stories below sequentially failed, the falling mass increased, further increasing the demand on the floors below, which were unable to arrest the moving mass.
The falling mass of the building compressed the air ahead of it, much like the action of a piston, forcing material, such as smoke and debris, out the windows ...."
Now, I do have issues with them saying "essentially free fall," but that's semantics. It's obvious to anyone who's seen videos or still photos of the collapses that "free falling' debris hits the ground HUNDREDS OF FEET before the bulk of the towers do. I show examples of that in my critique. The difference in speeds is due to the resistance that the interior portions had to overcome. That's quite basic. If you want to say, "within seconds" of free-fall speed, that would be perfectly accurate, and perfectly in accordance with physical laws.
Keep in mind that no structural engineers, fire safety engineers, demolitions experts, or failure analysts have supported the claims put forth in "Loose Change."
As for the Russian bombings, I look forward to seeing the evidence you have that they are connected to 9/11.
-Gravy
How about the firefighters that also said they saw bombs and when a firefighter says this they know what they saw really were bombs. In any normal stable stable situation unlike the 9/11 attacks firefighters would have called in the bomb squad.
If you bother to research you will find many video camera footages of firefighters saying this on 9/11.
http://www.prisonplanet.tv
Watch Martial Law 9/11: Rise of The Police State
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...
Alex Jones mentions many interesting news articles from the mainstream media that are still available to view online. Alex Jones will be releasing his new documentary video Terrorstorm in several months time.
http://www.myspace.com/alex_infowarrior
All of Alex Jones' sources are from government sources and mainstream media sources. Some also from both classified and declassified documents and he hosts some great people on his radio talk show even CIA agents and other intelligence officers along with many scientists.
All his work is legal to download and distribute freely.
As Alex Jones says - you have to be a conspiracy theorist to believe the official government fairytale.
I love the CT's, great entertainment! Too bad about actual evidence but hey, they may make some money out of the gullible and stupid.
http://www.seeloosechange.com
McGovern: Staged terror attacks across Europe, US "probable" in order to justify invasion.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/jun...
Former CIA analyst and Presidential advisor Ray McGovern, fresh from his heated public confrontation with Donald Rumsfeld, fears that staged terror attacks across Europe and the US are probable in order to justify the Bush administration's plan to launch a military strike against Iran, which he thinks will take place in June or July.
Do any of you remember that Tony Blair signed an agreement with George Bush that if the USA invaded Iran the UK will jointly do so too, back in February 2005?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/jun...
Alex Jones predicted the WTC Towers would be bombed several years before 9/11 and in 2001. See old video clips to prove this and see his reports why he knew this would happen. Also see related government documents of the time.
http://www.myspace.com/alex_infowarrior
25 July 2001
SEE FOLLOWING VIDEO CLIP: ALEX JONES WARNS ABOUT ATTACKS BEFORE 9/11
Thanx for your help.
Turturis