"I will be willing to make a donation to a fund to bring about a private prosecution but only if 100 other people will make the same commitment."
— Guido Fawkes, Outraged of www.Order-Order.com (contact)
Deadline to sign up by: 5th November 2007
229 people signed up (129 over target)
Country: United Kingdom
More details
This is an exploratory initiative to judge the level of support that exists for the launching of a private prosecution of those who were investigated under Operation Ribble under suspicion of committing offences under the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925. There are a number of related suspected offences under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 governing the evasion of restrictions on donations which provide a firm and clear basis for action. A prosecution on this basis would avoid the difficulties of having to prove a conspiracy. It would also have the advantage that there are statements from donors already in the public domain which, contrary to the stated view of the CPS, exclude the possibility that the loans were made, or intended to be made, on a commercial basis.
Pledge makers are not committed to anything at this stage, this is merely to test the level of support there is for such an enterprise.
Pledge makers should be aware that the Attorney General could, at any time, rule a private prosecution to be not in the public interest ("nolle prosequi"). This terminates the proceedings and this power is not subject to judicial control or judicial review.
It is likely that in the event of a private prosecution the evidence already gathered by the police during Operation Ribble would be made available during the pre-trial period under the discovery process.
More info : guido.fawkes@order-order.com.
Background : http://www.order-order.com/search/label/...
See more pledges, and all about how PledgeBank works.

Guido Fawkes, the Pledge Creator, joined by:
Some of the people who signed this pledge also signed these pledges...
And remember calling it a loan was already a deceit to avoid having to declare it!
That'd go down well!
Alas the principal "nemo iudex in re sua" (no one shall judge his own cause) still rings true, so the AG can try worm out of it at his peril.
This is history in the making - the day when the people of these islands begin to restore the Rule of Law and the accountablity of our politicians.
The one proviso is that such support does not leave him open to perpetual and limitless liability should the prosecution fail. His stipend is meagre.
I suspect i'm on enough MI5 databases,as it is, at present!
A.Pedant.
So I will undertake to do all sorts of internet-running-about for you, blogging, writing, all that stuff. Phoning people, stuffing envelopes, you just give me a list and I'll get on with that crap, cos something ought to be done. Good on you Guido.
ALan Douglas
And for all the people who have
worked tirelessly to find cures for cancer over 20 years and are rewarded
with an honour. And for to all those who are brave and are rewarded with
an honour. And for the couple in their late fifties who have fostered
30 kids in their lifetime and are rewarded with a small honour. And for the man who started an enterprise in his garden shed and now employs 300
people earning Britain £millions for its NHS. And for the carer who
receives an MBE for 40 years selfless devotion to those who can't cope.
I'll pledge £300 to prosecute these crooks, because thanks to selfish and dishonest people like Blair and Levy, these small tokens of esteem, listed above, from the State - to its worthy citizens, are now (by
association) nearly worthless.
Well in Guido, my money's there mate.
It's time for them to speak.
Having unsuccessfuly tried to bring this government to account, for other similar matters, we are now sure that the rule of law is no longer operating here.
As a back up alternative course of action incase of blocking moves on the "Cash4Honours" prosecution.
You never know you might find a friendly Spanish judge!
Our House of Lords has been compromised and the hard working members of that august house must resent the inclusion of persons who have not EARNED a seat. We are now faced with the elevation of more 'Unworthies' Peter Mandelson and John Prescott to legislate upon us. Has the removal of 'Hereditry'peers improved the House...I think not.
Let's get to the bottom of Cash for Peerages now and remove the 'Bribers'